2004 Presidential Debates Analysis – Debate 1 – short version

I thought it might be handy to go through the debates, carefully listen to what each question was, and make note of whether each candidate responded at all to the question and in the event that they responded to the question, what they said. I have just spent over three hours on the first debate alone, so don’t expect the other three to come soon. I’ve got another ….. what, 18 days until the election? Fine. So here you have it. The relevant parts of the questions (ie: the questions themselves) and the most relevant parts of the answers (and in cases where nothing they said was in response to the question being asked, notation thereof).

Pretty straightforward. I basically assumed you’ve seen or heard the debates here. If you haven’t, you should go to audible.com or iTunes and download the debates for FREE. Double-check that I understood and conveyed the intentions of the messages of the candidates if you like (or if you suspect I have distorted) by getting the actual debate recording and comparing their actual words to what I wrote down. If you want to argue with my analysis, I will expect a time notation in the relevant audio file so we can all go see what was actually said.

I have not tried to make any notation as to whether either candidate’s statements are true or false, just to repeat what they said. If they said some lies and I repeated them here, feel free to comment – though I fully expect you to link to trustable sources that agree with you if you do.

I’ve made sure that every time either candidate was given the opportunity to respond, their name appears here on a separate line. This means that you’ll see a lot of “NO RELEVANT RESPONSE”, as their extended discussions often were not relevant to the question being asked. I am also posting a much longer version of this that includes some less-relevant but still somewhat-relevant responses. It is less clear, I think, but it’s there if you’re interested. So, here we go:

Presidential Debate #1, 9/30/2004

Question 1: Do you [Senator Kerry] believe you could do a better job than President Bush in preventing another terrorist attack on the United states?

KERRY: Yes I do.
BUSH: NO RELEVANT RESPONSE

Question 2: Do you believe the election of Senator Kerry on November 2nd would increase the chances of the US being hit by another 9/11-type terrorist attack?

BUSH: NO RELEVANT RESPONSE
KERRY: NO RELEVANT RESPONSE

Question 3: What colossal misjudgments, in your opinion, has President Bush made in these areas?

KERRY: He said to America that he would build a true alliance, exhaust UN remedies, and go to war as a last resort, but did not do those things. He moved the focus of the war on terror away from Afghanistan and onto Iraq.
BUSH: NO RELEVANT RESPONSE

Question 4: What about Senator Kerry

Published by

Teel

Author, artist, romantic, insomniac, exorcist, creative visionary, lover, and all-around-crazy-person.

4 thoughts on “2004 Presidential Debates Analysis – Debate 1 – short version”

  1. If you do this for the second debate and just do the part that covers domestic issues, and then just a few questions from the third debate, then you can recap everything that was said, and leave out all of what was repeated 🙂

    I’ll try and respond with a more specifics regarding what you posted later, but thanks for making this neat little re-cap for us.

  2. If you do this for the second debate and just do the part that covers domestic issues, and then just a few questions from the third debate, then you can recap everything that was said, and leave out all of what was repeated 🙂

    I’ll try and respond with a more specifics regarding what you posted later, but thanks for making this neat little re-cap for us.

  3. First, I would like say that you are doing a good job of going in depth with the presidential debate. Keep up the good work! ^_^

    What I personaly think is that Bush is all up for the War on Terror, but Kerry doesn’t really give a rat’s feces. Why do I think this? Because Kerry focuses on other problems with a larger magnitude on the war on terror.

    Here’s what I see:

    Bush is focused overseas

    Kerry is focused at home.

    Now, I wouldn’t mind voting for Kerry, but I would rather do it without our country being at war. Since I believe that George Bush’s head is where it belongs at the moment, I would rather vote for him.

    -End Comment-

  4. First, I would like say that you are doing a good job of going in depth with the presidential debate. Keep up the good work! ^_^

    What I personaly think is that Bush is all up for the War on Terror, but Kerry doesn’t really give a rat’s feces. Why do I think this? Because Kerry focuses on other problems with a larger magnitude on the war on terror.

    Here’s what I see:

    Bush is focused overseas

    Kerry is focused at home.

    Now, I wouldn’t mind voting for Kerry, but I would rather do it without our country being at war. Since I believe that George Bush’s head is where it belongs at the moment, I would rather vote for him.

    -End Comment-

Comments are closed.